Inside Higher Ed's recent article "Making Space for Student Sorrow Over AI" really struck a chord with me. It highlights something I see often in my work: the emotional tension AI can create in higher education, especially when it comes to creativity, identity, and the future of work.
The situation at UMBC, where an AI-generated art assignment led to student protests and even vandalism, is a clear sign that we need to do more than just introduce AI into classrooms—we need to talk about it. The discomfort, frustration, and even sorrow some students feel about AI aren’t just resistance to change; they’re real, valid concerns about the role of human creativity in an increasingly automated world.
Here’s the thing: AI is already deeply embedded in the media we consume. Music, film, TV, and video games all use AI in everything from visual effects to music composition and script analysis. That doesn’t mean human creativity is being replaced—it’s evolving. But if students don’t get the chance to openly discuss and critically engage with AI, they’re left with fear instead of curiosity, frustration instead of empowerment.
So, how do we do better?
✅ Create space for real conversations – Students need forums where they can unpack their concerns about AI, not just be told to embrace it. We need to listen, not just implement.
✅ Teach AI literacy in every discipline – AI isn’t just for computer science majors. Artists, writers, musicians, and philosophers should all be part of the conversation, learning how AI intersects with their fields.
✅ Acknowledge the ethical concerns – Let’s be honest: AI raises real questions about authorship, originality, and labor. Ignoring those concerns won’t make them go away—addressing them head-on will.
✅ Encourage human-AI collaboration – Instead of “AI vs. humans,” let’s show students how AI can be a creative partner. Whether it’s brainstorming, enhancing workflows, or pushing creative boundaries, there are ways to use AI without losing the human touch.
Higher ed has a huge opportunity here—not just to integrate AI, but to lead the conversation on what thoughtful, responsible AI use looks like. If we don’t, we risk leaving students with frustration rather than innovation, and that’s a loss for everyone.
Comments